Hillary

Same age as JFK.

And of course it's about who has the $$$$ backing their candidacy.

Eric wrote:

Rubio is pretty young. I think that will work against his candidacy.

Rubio has much more experience and leadership experience at the state level than obama did before running for president as a rookie senator. But I've heard what you said repeatedly the last few days.

BREAKING: Hillary Clinton announces plans to become the top story on Fox News for next 4-8 years.- Tea Party Cat

Marco Rubio. The voice of the younger generation that has the exact same policies as George W. Bush.- LOLGOP

Democrats for HRC

Hillary and obama are much closer to bush2&3 than rubio, cruz, paul... etc.

I suppose one big difference between Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton is she still supports his immigration bill.- LOLGOP

At what point in the Clinton presidency, will the Benghazi committee just become a permanent branch of government?- LOLGOP

PkrBum wrote:

Hillary and obama are much closer to bush2&3 than rubio, cruz, paul... etc.

The really amazing thing is Oblamer kept many of Bush's policies in place but now those policies are good....if you know what I mean....HRC is tied at the hip to Wall Street and would rather shoot than try to come up with a plan. I really don't want to listen to her whine for 4 years that she "inherited this mess" like we've heard the last 6 plus years.

nochain wrote:

Remember hrc said this entire episode wasn't true and it was all a right wing conspiracy....

nochain wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Hillary and obama are much closer to bush2&3 than rubio, cruz, paul... etc.

The really amazing thing is Oblamer kept many of Bush's policies in place but now those policies are good....if you know what I mean....HRC is tied at the hip to Wall Street and would rather shoot than try to come up with a plan. I really don't want to listen to her whine for 4 years that she "inherited this mess" like we've heard the last 6 plus years.

Many on the left stood outraged at the patriot act under President Bush as an invasion of privacy to ordinary law abiding citizens....some of the very outraged now seem ok with the cowh expanding those invasions....well unless you're a senator and find out your staff has been investigated...She does have that voice like fingernails on a chalkboard!....

This may not matter that the left will excuse literally anything. This may be influence peddling... and at least is highly unethical and shows again that she sees herself above the average citizen... as if her erasing the private server didn't make that perfectly clear.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/new-book-clinton-cash-questions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?_r=0&referrer=

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/two_scandals_in_one_newsweek_uncovers_clinton_foundations_biggest_donor_likely_violating_iran_sanctions.html

PkrBum wrote:

This may not matter that the left will excuse literally anything. This may be influence peddling... and at least is highly unethical and shows again that she sees herself above the average citizen... as if her erasing the private server didn't make that perfectly clear.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/new-book-clinton-cash-questions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?_r=0&referrer=

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/two_scandals_in_one_newsweek_uncovers_clinton_foundations_biggest_donor_likely_violating_iran_sanctions.html

Hm.m..m...m.... $50 billion goes to Iran through Obama's latest deal, there's a Ukrainian guy who has interests in Iran, the Clinton foundation receives large donations from same Ukrainian guy.

Nope! There's obviously nothing there.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsVEWeBkDY0

While we're at it... $50 Billion makes $5 million to $10 million look like peanuts comparatively now doesn't it. Makes the bitchin' that Polecat is doing on the other thread about other peoples wealth shrink to next to nothing in comparison... Especially when the Clinton foundation is receiving a $29 million donation from some Ukrainian.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll3uipTO-4A

PkrBum wrote:

This may not matter that the left will excuse literally anything. This may be influence peddling... and at least is highly unethical and shows again that she sees herself above the average citizen... as if her erasing the private server didn't make that perfectly clear.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/new-book-clinton-cash-questions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html?_r=0&referrer=

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/two_scandals_in_one_newsweek_uncovers_clinton_foundations_biggest_donor_likely_violating_iran_sanctions.html

Don't the allegations against hrc rise to a higher level than those against Sen Martinez (D-NJ)?....And he was indicted!....The Clinton cronies are out in full force and yes it's a 'right wing conspiracy' and a 'right wing witch hunt' [isn't that sexist to use that term when discussing hrc?] and yet the story and questioning originally came from the NY Times----hardly a right wing media outlet....They gave examples of how money was funneled into the foundation coffers after meetings etc., with the then sec of state...No nothing here...it's the Clintons...

[quote="mediawatcher"]

nochain wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Hillary and obama are much closer to bush2&3 than rubio, cruz, paul... etc.

.She does have that voice like fingernails on a chalkboard!....

And what would you call that High-pitched b!tch squeal that comes out of reverend ted cruz mouth?

How will she satisfy the govt authority we must all comply with? If there was ONE email among the thousands that related to the clinton foundation it is obviously a violation of the us code related to her public records obligation. It would never work that we claim that we've only destroyed potential evidence that was innocent in nature. Why would she get a pass that would be extended to NONE of us... not to our tax records... not to a myriad of other legal documents and contacts... not even to a simple disclaimer. Her only defense can be transparency and immediate disclosure of records... which she refuses to turn over and claims to have innocently destroyed.

PkrBum wrote:

How will she satisfy the govt authority we must all comply with? If there was ONE email among the thousands that related to the clinton foundation it is obviously a violation of the us code related to her public records obligation. It would never work that we claim that we've only destroyed potential evidence that was innocent in nature. Why would she get a pass that would be extended to NONE of us... not to our tax records... not to a myriad of other legal documents and contacts... not even to a simple disclaimer. Her only defense can be transparency and immediate disclosure of records... which she refuses to turn over and claims to have innocently destroyed.

It was pretty sad that Chelsea had to go before the cameras and attempt to clean up the Clinton Foundation mess that was created by her parents...Not to defend any politician but to throw mud at others and defend the actions of the Clinton's over the years/decades is political blindness...

The Billary Hillbilly's are renowned for behind the curtain deal making and covering up their tracks. They make your average inner-city crack dealer look honest by comparison.

nochain wrote:

The Billary Hillbilly's are renowned for behind the curtain deal making and covering up their tracks. They make your average inner-city crack dealer look honest by comparison.

What did her spin team say...'some errors were made'....Geez if Al Capone had this team he may have walked on all the tax 'errors' that he made too!....When some were fooled by the cowh it was understandable in the sense that he had no record...well aside from the criminal record hrc should have...there is a record of wheeling and dealing with no accomplishments....little difficult to be fooled by the Clinton Team...

polecat wrote:

You could have put one puppeteer, changed it to Democrats and put Soros' name tag and it would have been the same intent.

Oligarchs rule the USA... sad, but true.

Eric wrote:

polecat wrote:

You could have put one puppeteer, changed it to Democrats and put Soros' name tag and it would have been the same intent.

Oligarchs rule the USA... sad, but true.

Exactly, whether liberal, conservative, or something in between, when it takes a billion bucks to get in the W/H every politician is owned by the people with the money.

nochain wrote:

Eric wrote:

You could have put one puppeteer, changed it to Democrats and put Soros' name tag and it would have been the same intent.

Oligarchs rule the USA... sad, but true.

Exactly, whether liberal, conservative, or something in between, when it takes a billion bucks to get in the W/H every politician is owned by the people with the money.

All TRUE
but what the hay

Why o why won’t America believe that this 174th Clinton “scandal” is for sure, a 100% game changer where none of the others ever were? Why?- Tea Party Cat

Clinton. Supported by the oligarchy, and the lemmings that follow them blindly, but most definitely more the same...

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svDfUSvFDmA