Hillary

And why would a country that oppresses women donate to a cause for women's rights?

It defies logic. The donations were obviously for a different purpose.

PkrBum wrote:

And why would a country that oppresses women donate to a cause for women's rights?

It defies logic. The donations were obviously for a different purpose.

Further as posted....she went on a rant against the Bush Administration (Karl Rove) for RNC e-mails being used for government business...."Shredding our Constitution"....."Corruption"....and "Cronyism" were the allegations in her own words in 2007....Now she's replaced that with "a matter of convenience" when it involves her as sos.....

Try as she might with her spinners.....'Right Wingers' aren't responsible for her setting up and using personal e-mail accounts and certainly not responsible for her collecting donations from foreign countries that oppress women's rights...In these situations the blame....accountability rest squarely with hrc and her doing whatever needs to be done to get to the WH like she feels is her right....

She, attempted to use the 'right wingers' for going after her and Bill....well until that soiled blue dress became public knowledge...At some point in time you'd think that people would see her for what she is....a liar and opportunist that feels she is above rules and laws....

Hard to straighten another crooked mess....by crooks.

We're conducting an internal investigation of the affair and will release our results to the public when it's completed.

*****SARCASTIC CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWqKPWO5T4o



They should add that one to the Little Book Of Corporate Lies.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/11/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-many-deleted-of-billions-from-state/

Apparently hillary's due diligence was to do a keyword search before deletion.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/time-magazine-hillary-clinton-key-word-search-to-decide-emails-to-delete/?google_editors_picks=true

" Clinton is featured on the cover of the latest issue of "Time" magazine, in silhouette and under the headline "The Clinton Way." The article suggests Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, "write their own rules" in the battle that is U.S. politics, and it asks whether the tactics can see the veteran Democrat through the current controversy over the emails.

Alex Altman, Washington D.C. correspondent for "Time," told CBSN on Thursday that, as the magazine's cover story explains, Clinton and her team of lawyers decided which of the more than 60,000 emails on her personal server should be deleted based on simple key-word searches, rather than a detailed inspection of each of the messages.

By law any emails pertaining to Clinton's official work as Secretary of State were supposed to have been copied into government servers for permanent records. An archives expert told "Time" that the methodology used by Clinton's team to determine which emails met the criteria for permanent storage "did not meet best practices."

"She basically looked first at all the emails that included a .gov email address, then she used key words; words like 'Benghazi,' like 'Libya,' the names of particular staff that she was known to have emailed. So rather than go through and look at them one-by-one, she essentially chose some shortcuts, and while they may have made sense, that practice essentially raises the chance that an email that was work-related and therefore had to be public record might have slipped through the cracks," Altman told CBSN's Jeff Glor.

Republicans have demanded a "forensic" examination of the server at Clinton's residence in Chappaqua, New York. But in spite of the unrelenting pressure on the expected two-time presidential candidate, Altman urged caution against counting out the Democratic family which has weathered a storm or two in the past.

"One thing that the Clintons have been very deft at over the years is turning an issue, when they are under scrutiny, against their enemies," Altman told CBSN.

"We saw Hillary Clinton talk about the 'vast right-wing conspiracy,' and I think that one of the tactics that they've used over the years is knowing that, when they're talking about their enemies rather than themselves, it's been a good tool to pull them out of scrapes, and the more Republicans come after her and potentially over-reach, it becomes about them rather than about her own conduct."

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKprr3tEBew

I just heard on npr that the left is furious because the time cover has the m above hillary's head and give the appearance that she has devils horns... lol.

Where's WikiLeaks and their uncontrollable desire to release e-mails when you need them...

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5bAa6gFvLs

Agreed... or the nsa metadata collection. I refuse to believe anything is deleted.

The govt is nothing if not redundant.

Her personal email isn't the issue... but you know that. Unless it's not personal.

Do you think you or I would be given the benefit of the doubt you allow her?

Yea team..!!

It just keeps unraveling. Her assertion that emails sent to .gov addresses is false.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/state-dept-shuts-parts-unclassified-computer-network-29625961

polecat wrote:

I wouldn't have responded to any of those outrageously biased, far-left wing, hate mongering, lie mills either.

I always enjoy reading about how old Bill and Hillary are going down, down down. There's always some scandal or the other that is going to be the ONE that finally gets them.

I have to repeat DE's "chuckle" whenever I read that stuff.
Let's see, 1992 to 2015 is 23 years of Republican effort to crash the Clintons.

And Hillary still has the support of over 80% of Democratic primary voters. She's going to be the nominee next year. Nothing will stop Bill from walking through those doors by her side but a decent Repupblican challenger.

Problem is, she leads them all by double digits.
The word is ALTERNATIVE. Republicans need to find one real quick.

Nothing matters... we get it.

It's a vast left-wing conspiracy... lol.

http://nypost.com/2015/03/14/obama-adviser-behind-leak-of-hillary-clintons-e-mail-scandal/

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inoUJ00Q72k

PkrBum wrote:

Nothing matters... we get it.

That's not necessarily so. It's just that the Republicans haven't found anything on the Clintons that has mattered yet.
Things that might destroy some lesser politicians career don't touch the Clintons because Democrats don't EXPECT them to be perfect. We know Bill won't keep his pants zipped and we know Hillary does not care because she craves power like kids crave chocolate. We know their marriage is probably a convenience but then so was FDR's marriage and JFK's marriage and Democrats think those were two pretty good presidents.

What you get with the Clintons is a moderate governance that is competent and smart. They have the respect of the rest of the world as leaders. Nobody has to prove anything. Bill has already proven he can handle the economy and foreign affairs and he'll be right there next to Hillary in case she starts to screw up.

After George W Bush's disaster of a presidency and Barack Obama's wasted years in office it's time to get back to business in Washington.

PkrBum wrote:

It's a vast left-wing conspiracy... lol.

http://nypost.com/2015/03/14/obama-adviser-behind-leak-of-hillary-clintons-e-mail-scandal/

That would not surprise me at all. I never figured Obama and Hillary were close buddies.
It doesn't matter. Obama won't keep Hillary out of the White House either. He hasn't been the POTUS the Dems wanted anyway.

Eddard wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Nothing matters... we get it.

That's not necessarily so. It's just that the Republicans haven't found anything on the Clintons that has mattered yet.
Things that might destroy some lesser politicians career don't touch the Clintons because Democrats don't EXPECT them to be perfect. We know Bill won't keep his pants zipped and we know Hillary does not care because she craves power like kids crave chocolate. We know their marriage is probably a convenience but then so was FDR's marriage and JFK's marriage and Democrats think those were two pretty good presidents.

What  you get with the Clintons is a moderate governance that is competent and smart. They have the respect of the rest of the world as leaders. Nobody has to prove anything. Bill has already proven he can handle the economy and foreign affairs and he'll be right there next to Hillary in case she starts to screw up.

After George W Bush's disaster of a presidency and Barack Obama's wasted years in office it's time to get back to business in Washington.

I see... So long as they're competent and smart it doesn't matter who the Democratic candidate is they have to be better than the opposition no matter what they do.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fknUlQ3mlwM

PkrBum wrote:

Her personal email isn't the issue... but you know that. Unless it's not personal.

Do you think you or I would be given the benefit of the doubt you allow her?

Yea team..!!

Attempting to bring up her personal e-mails is simply a ploy to cover her stupidity....or what she did for convenience....

   Today:  Team Clinton now says that staff reviewed all 32,00 e-mails before deleting 30,000.... Just needed more time to get the lies in order....A couple of more days and all will be accounted for and this will be Bush's fault....

PkrBum wrote:

Nothing matters... we get it.

Exactly, the excuse machine is operating at full-throttle right now. When even Carville says her email shenanigans were to avoid oversight but legal and Dems don't think that's a problem, well that's a problem.

nochain wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Nothing matters... we get it.

Exactly, the excuse machine is operating at full-throttle right now. When even Carville says her email shenanigans were to avoid oversight but legal and Dems don't think that's a problem, well that's a problem.

The same dems that screamed in 2007?....Calling Rove and the Bush administration "corrupt"..."shredding the Constitution" and "dealing in "cronyism"....All for using private servers?....These were the words of hrc so there's no wonder why some see nothing wrong with her actions now.....If you ask the question "at this point in time does it really matter?".... This is how she has and continues to be a leader?....Do as I say not as I do...above the rules and possibly the laws....wait a little while and it'll be explained away as the fault of the 'right wing conspiracy' or simply go away...Well some voted for this cowh twice so who's surprised that they support hrc?...

This is totally speculation with no data to back up, however, it is worth a ponder and maybe there is something out there to back it up. Hillary is from Chicago. Obama calls Chicago home. In the "politics" and old haunts of mobster days and their divisions of power, Hillary and Obama are in different Chicago style politics. Does Chicago style politics play into this and into any power reaches to the White House overall?????

This is definitely not a Republican witch hunt (sorry for that comparison Hillary.) This is mobster politics. And you don't have to be from Chicago to participate.