Hillary

http://m.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/hillary-clinton-email-transparency-secretary-state/386641/

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?referrer=

Will we again hear from Hillary, "What does it matter?"

As Roseann Roseanna Danna always said, "It's always a'somethin."

From home or on the road, private e-mail is probably easier to access than a government account, but most likely less secure.

She'd probably have to deal with a gubment VPN to access her e-mail if it was on a gubment server.

She still should have jumped through the hoops that were required.

Hillary sure has a bunch of lint hanging all over her, not a good choice for a President.

She was probably married to Morris at one time...

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BM6ZjbxO1m0

Eric wrote:

From home or on the road, private e-mail is probably easier to access than a government account, but most likely less secure.

She'd probably have to deal with a gubment VPN to access her e-mail if it was on a gubment server.

She still should have jumped through the hoops that were required.

Absolutely. She was the Secretary of State!

nochain wrote:

Hillary sure has a bunch of lint hanging all over her, not a good choice for a President.

That's not lint and it stinks!.....

Democrat = Despise, hate with vengeance

Joanimaroni wrote:

Eric wrote:

From home or on the road, private e-mail is probably easier to access than a government account, but most likely less secure.

She'd probably have to deal with a gubment VPN to access her e-mail if it was on a gubment server.

She still should have jumped through the hoops that were required.

Absolutely. She was the Secretary of State!

Ah...oh.....hrc in 2007 going after the Bush Admin (Karl Rove) partially including the use of RNC E-Mails..."Our Constitution is being shredded. We know about the secret wiretaps, the secret military tribunals, THE SECRET WHITE HOUSE E-EMAIL ACCOUNTS"....hrc....

At the WH Press briefing...asked bluntly as to whether hrc turned over e-mails for the seven committees that have investigated Benghazi that they [WH] quote as finding 'no evidence of any wrongdoing'.....WH Spokesman....started to comment....Then questioned again that no e-mails were turned over to those seven committees but now has been found that e-mails had been turned over to Rep Gowdy's Committee two weeks ago....
Again questioned....so yourself and the presvious press spokesperson both stood and made the claim that the seven committees found nothing....will you now acknowlwdge that those seven committees never received those e-mails from hrc?.....WH Spokesman...All that I will say is that those committees never found and evidence of wrong doing....
The WH would only confirm that the information is what was provided by the Clinton Team...asked if they believe the information given by the Clinton Team....this is the infomation provided and we have no reason to disbelieve what we've been told....
hrc: ran own e-mail server while sec of state from her residence...found that this information was not secured....

nochain wrote:

Hillary sure has a bunch of lint hanging all over her, not a good choice for a President.

Headline...Left in the Dark.....' Reportedly even the White House didn't know hrc was using her personal e-mail account'

Rats begin to distance themselves....

One more time some folks are expecting a big outcry over this.
Colin Powell admitted he always used private e-mail too.
Benghazi isn't going to keep Hillary from being nominated and neither is this.
Democratic voters don't care about this nit picking stuff. They've been sick of it since Monica Lewinsky.
And once she's nominated she'll win easily. Her only competition would be Jeb and the tea party won't stand for him being nominated.
That is the real problem the Republicans will have in this election and every presidential election in the future. They just do not "get it."
They can't nominate a centrist and America is centrist. They have to kick the tea party to the curb first and they don't have the guts to do it.
I'm surprised so many of them voted to fund Homeland Security in the house. Passing a clean bill did take come courage. A few of them must get it.

Unfortunately, I doubt Hillary will be any better president than Obama has been.

Eddard wrote:

One more time some folks are expecting a big outcry over this.
Colin Powell admitted he always used private e-mail too.
Benghazi isn't going to keep Hillary from being nominated and neither is this.
Democratic voters don't care about this nit picking stuff. They've been sick of it since Monica Lewinsky.
And once she's nominated she'll win easily. Her only competition would be Jeb and the tea party won't stand for him being nominated.
That is the real problem the Republicans will have in this election and every  presidential election in the future. They just do not "get it."
They can't nominate a centrist and America is centrist. They have to kick the tea party to the curb first and they don't have the guts to do it.
I'm surprised so many of them voted to fund Homeland Security in the house. Passing a clean bill did take come courage. A few of them must get it.

Unfortunately, I doubt Hillary will be any better president than Obama has been.

The DHS bill was a direct defeat for the tea bangers.

It is very disturbing to me if there are months of e-mails missing (as has been reported) in the batch that Hillary submitted.  

Reminds me of a certain 17-minute gap in a tape...

I think it is time for the Feds to swoop in unannounced and seize that server for analysis.

Agreed. She's supposed to speak and take questions at 2pm est.

My guess is we'll get another "what does it matter".

She admitted to deleting emails that SHE decided were personal.

She refused to allow independent verification.

A supeona for the server should be issued immediately.

I would agree that her e-mails need to be made public but this isn't going to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House either. Over 80 percent of Democratic primary voters plan to vote for her if and when she runs. That came out yesterday in a poll. They don't really give a hoot in hades about her e-mail records.

Republicans need to stop demonizing the Clintons and work on finding a candidate that could compete against them. That's a tough project considering the Republicans that seem to want to be POTUS. Most of them are tea party lovelies that could never win a national election.
I can tell you this, demonizing the Clintons didn't work with Democrats even when people were trying to say they murdered somebody. A bunch of old e-mails ain't gonna do it either.

I'm not going to vote for her and I'm a Dem.  Well, I guess if she was running against Lucifer...

How about good ol' boy, Joe Biden?  I have seen several articles in the last few days with his name and "run for President" in the title.

I like ole Joe... but I don't think he'd make a good president.

Back to the point... Hillary is circumventing the very tenants that bind we the people. She says that verification that any of us would be required to submit to... is beneath her. That just because she says that she has complied should be sufficient. But would that apply to you or me? Hell no it wouldn't. I want the server and any drive or recording devise supeoned immediately. I want the entire process investigated... now.

http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2015/03/10/hillary-clinton-emails-remaining-questions/

And there's much more that I want RIGHT now.

I want to know exactly WHO donated to the clinton foundation... for what reasons... under what pretense. It's absolutely unfathomable that our sos would be receiving foreign donations knowing full well her ambition to become potus. The conflicts are undeniable... even though I'm sure nothing will matter to her supporters... nothing... ever. We get it.

Eric wrote:

I'm not going to vote for her and I'm a Dem.  Well, I guess if she was running against Lucifer...

How about good ol' boy, Joe Biden?  I have seen several articles in the last few days with his name and "run for President" in the title.

I take it that means you're not voting Eagle for President in 2016.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuGzJVKtW6g

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UUYjd2rjsE

PkrBum wrote:

And there's much more that I want RIGHT now.

I want to know exactly WHO donated to the clinton foundation... for what reasons... under what pretense. It's absolutely unfathomable that our sos would be receiving foreign donations knowing full well her ambition to become potus. The conflicts are undeniable... even though I'm sure nothing will matter to her supporters... nothing... ever. We get it.

I just don't see any of that happenin' anytime soon there Pkr.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IFd583RMQo

PkrBum wrote:

Back to the point... Hillary is circumventing the very tenants that bind we the people. She says that verification that any of us would be required to submit to... is beneath her. That just because she says that she has complied should be sufficient. But would that apply to you or me? Hell no it wouldn't. I want the server and any drive or recording devise supeoned immediately. I want the entire process investigated... now.

http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2015/03/10/hillary-clinton-emails-remaining-questions/

She told others in the State Dept while she was the Sec of State to comply and not use personal e-mail accounts for government business...The point made is exactly on point...rules/laws are for everyone else and the Clinton's are above those same rules/laws....do as I say not as I do...

Her press conference was a disaster and in the mind of hrc the issue is over because she said....in her mind it was a matter of 'convenience' in order not to have to use two phones....which contradicts an earlier statement in which she said she had used two phones....

On a lighter side....hrc said she used this primarily to e-mail her husband....later in the afternoon a spokesperson for the former president stated that Bill Clinton had only sent two e-mails in his life and both were done while he was in office....guess Bubba didn't get the talking points memo from the wife....

Damaged Eagle wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

And there's much more that I want RIGHT now.

I want to know exactly WHO donated to the clinton foundation... for what reasons... under what pretense. It's absolutely unfathomable that our sos would be receiving foreign donations knowing full well her ambition to become potus. The conflicts are undeniable... even though I'm sure nothing will matter to her supporters... nothing... ever. We get it.

I just don't see any of that happenin' anytime soon there Pkr.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IFd583RMQo

There may be something here....hrc and her team is under the impression that the firestorm will pass and the news cycle (well those that even cover this) will move along to another topic....

The same sos that in the past that has accused republicans of a 'war against women' and she accepted money from nations that treat their women citizens as second hand citizens and/or property....and not one word from the National Organization of Women of any other group that are supposed to be advocates of Women's Rights...

Again this is typical Hillary politics....she has her spin doctors (Lanny Davis and James Carville) already saying that this is the 'right wingers'