Everyday Pensacola

A place to discuss Pensacola, Florida area topics as well as the rest of the nation/world. To write a post, you must register and log in.
 
HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Good one Nancy......

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
mediawatcher

avatar

Posts : 3139
Join date : 2013-08-07

PostSubject: Good one Nancy......   Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:55 am

Rep Pelosi got upset Friday when a reporter asked her about democrats that vowed to block any Supreme Court nominations by President George W. Bush when he had 18 months left in office......Ms Pelsoi said......Those were different circumstances......You really can't make this stupidity up.....
Back to top Go down
Jake92



Posts : 1505
Join date : 2013-02-15
Age : 66
Location : Pensaclola, FL

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:58 pm

Just another politician willing to sell the country and LEGAL voters for money, just like Harry Reid...
Back to top Go down
nochain

avatar

Posts : 2888
Join date : 2013-04-24

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:00 pm

The fanatical liberals incredible hypocrisy doesn't even register with her equally fanatical drones.
Back to top Go down
Jake92



Posts : 1505
Join date : 2013-02-15
Age : 66
Location : Pensaclola, FL

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:31 pm

You're 100% correct about them and their drones being fanatical liberals..
Back to top Go down
mediawatcher

avatar

Posts : 3139
Join date : 2013-08-07

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Tue Mar 08, 2016 6:16 am

nochain wrote:
The fanatical liberals incredible hypocrisy doesn't even register with her equally fanatical drones.

Even Sen Schumer (D-NY) when shown his speech on the Senate floor saying pretty much the same thing that he'd vote against President Bush appointing a Supreme Court judge had a similar reaction....Yes there was a difference...then the democrats controlled the Senate and could do it well within their job description and now they don't control the Senate and they want their cowh to be allowed.....their whining is laughable......
Back to top Go down
Eddard

avatar

Posts : 614
Join date : 2014-09-20

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Tue Mar 08, 2016 5:38 pm

LOL. They may have "vowed" to stop any candidate from being confirmed, but they did not do it, did they?
Bush got both John Roberts and Samuel Alito through the Senate.
Apparently the Republicans just  like getting paid to not do their job.


The situation did not exist with W's presidency. Talk about whining. You're whining about a speech Chuck Shumer made about something that never happened.
Back to top Go down
mediawatcher

avatar

Posts : 3139
Join date : 2013-08-07

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:09 am

Eddard wrote:
LOL. They may have "vowed" to stop any candidate from being confirmed, but they did not do it, did they?
Bush got both John Roberts and Samuel Alito through the Senate.
Apparently the Republicans just  like getting paid to not do their job.


The situation did not exist with W's presidency. Talk about whining. You're whining about a speech Chuck Shumer made about something that never happened.

Not whining....just pointing out the inconsistencies and hypocrisy...Not doing their jobs?...When there's been a leader like Dirty Harry Reid running the Senate....what was is 300 pieces of legislation on his desk that he refused to even allow discussion...let alone a vote?....But then again with his dirty land deals in Vegas he really didn't need to work....
Back to top Go down
Eddard

avatar

Posts : 614
Join date : 2014-09-20

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Wed Mar 09, 2016 4:22 pm

That's because out of those 300 pieces of legislation, probably 299 of them were to overturn Obamacare.

20 million Americans rely on Obamacare to get their health issues addressed.
Not very nice of the Republicans in Congress to want to rip it away from them.
Back to top Go down
nochain

avatar

Posts : 2888
Join date : 2013-04-24

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:15 am

Eddard wrote:
That's because out of those 300 pieces of legislation, probably 299 of them were to overturn Obamacare.

20 million Americans rely on Obamacare to get their health issues addressed.
Not very nice of the Republicans in Congress to want to rip it away from them.

Nope, not even close - a few dozen dealt with full or partial HCA repeals including things like the Medical device tax. Reids obstruction was politically motivated during an election year. Nothing more, nothing less.
Back to top Go down
Eric

avatar

Posts : 9735
Join date : 2012-07-30
Age : 66
Location : Hoover, AL & Pensacola when I'm lucky

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:52 pm

This partisanship drives me bonkers...and I don't need help in that regard.

I don't give a damn about ugly partisan politics on either side. If a bill is a good bill and the vast majority of the public supports it, the scumbags in Washington should not declare a bill "dead upon arrival" simply because it was submitted by an opposing political party.

Now, if another scumbag inserts pork into a bill at the last minute... that's different. We need a line item veto that actually works. I know they tried it a while back and it didn't work, but don't remember the particulars.

_________________
Ideas are funny little things, they won't work unless you do.
Back to top Go down
http://ericericson.net
mediawatcher

avatar

Posts : 3139
Join date : 2013-08-07

PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   Fri Mar 11, 2016 9:12 am

Eric wrote:
This partisanship drives me bonkers...and I don't need help in that regard.

I don't give a damn about ugly partisan politics on either side.  If a bill is a good bill and the vast majority of the public supports it, the scumbags in Washington should not declare a bill "dead upon arrival" simply because it was submitted by an opposing political party.

Now, if another scumbag inserts pork into a bill at the last minute... that's different.  We need a line item veto that actually works.  I know they tried it a while back and it didn't work, but don't remember the particulars.

The other part of that equation is the 'add ons' to what may be a good piece of legislation....again you are correct it's political and then when there are campaign commercials being made they can run attack ads that a candidate voted against ______________ which is true but in reality the no vote was done because of an add on.....Common sense would have been to have the line item veto YEARS ago....most governors have it and that's what allows them to get mandated budgets passed through state legislatures...well that an the threat of across the board cuts should they fail to do so...
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Good one Nancy......   

Back to top Go down
 
Good one Nancy......
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Everyday Pensacola :: Politics-
Jump to: