| Question... | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139 Join date : 2013-08-07
| Subject: Question... Fri Aug 21, 2015 4:32 am | |
| If....should....Bruce....errr....Caitlyn Jenner be convicted [was Bruce but transitioning at the time] what facility would ___ be sentenced to?....Now this could be some real courtroom drama and the defense team's strategy will most certainly benefit ___ reality show.... | |
|
| |
Eric
Posts : 9738 Join date : 2012-07-30 Age : 73 Location : Pensacola
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Aug 21, 2015 8:51 am | |
| He and Bill Cosby could be roomies! What a show that would be. Call it the Lady & the Tramp. | |
|
| |
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139 Join date : 2013-08-07
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Aug 21, 2015 8:56 am | |
| - Eric wrote:
- He and Bill Cosby could be roomies!
What a show that would be. Call it the Lady & the Tramp. Throw Jared in the mix too!...It may explain why ___ went through this transition safer among the women inmates?.... | |
|
| |
Eddard
Posts : 614 Join date : 2014-09-20
| Subject: Re: Question... Sat Sep 12, 2015 7:39 pm | |
| I don't think he could be put in the women's prison since his (place forum approved word here) is still in place and could do some damage. I doubt he would be safe in a men's facility either.
Maybe this whole sex change thing is a prelude to some masterminded criminal scheme he's got in mind. He knows if he gets caught there's nowhere they could sentence him to.
I might start watching reality shows if one involved Cosby drugging Jenner -the sight Cosby could get might cure him forever of his perversion. | |
|
| |
riceme
Posts : 3098 Join date : 2012-12-02 Age : 52 Location : Fox, Alaska
| Subject: Re: Question... Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:48 pm | |
| Men's prison. She is pre-op... still legally a man. But you can bet your ass if anything will, this will spark the national discussion on the subject. | |
|
| |
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139 Join date : 2013-08-07
| Subject: Re: Question... Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:03 am | |
| - riceme wrote:
- Men's prison. She is pre-op... still legally a man. But you can bet your ass if anything will, this will spark the national discussion on the subject.
That's the way it should be....but it's California!....Maybe Gov Moonbeam will pardon.... | |
|
| |
riceme
Posts : 3098 Join date : 2012-12-02 Age : 52 Location : Fox, Alaska
| Subject: Re: Question... Tue Sep 29, 2015 1:29 pm | |
| - mediawatcher wrote:
- riceme wrote:
- Men's prison. She is pre-op... still legally a man. But you can bet your ass if anything will, this will spark the national discussion on the subject.
That's the way it should be....but it's California!....Maybe Gov Moonbeam will pardon.... Oh, that is a good point. House arrest? | |
|
| |
PkrBum
Posts : 1017 Join date : 2013-02-14 Location : 45th Parallel
| Subject: Re: Question... Tue Sep 29, 2015 1:55 pm | |
| Are y'all taking about that car accident where bruce gender was on the phone?
I thght that case was resolved? | |
|
| |
Jake92
Posts : 1513 Join date : 2013-02-15 Age : 73 Location : Pensaclola, FL
| Subject: Re: Question... Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:00 pm | |
| How about solitary confinement no matter what prison it ends up in?? NO interaction with other inmates at all.. Admitted in secrecy for it's privacy.. | |
|
| |
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139 Join date : 2013-08-07
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:16 am | |
| - Jake92 wrote:
- How about solitary confinement no matter what prison it ends up in?? NO interaction with other inmates at all.. Admitted in secrecy for it's privacy..
Yesterday it was announced that 'it' will not face prison time.....Someone must have made deal..... | |
|
| |
Jake92
Posts : 1513 Join date : 2013-02-15 Age : 73 Location : Pensaclola, FL
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:26 am | |
| A deal would just prove a lack of ethics for the one getting the money.. It probably includes lawyers and judges too..
| |
|
| |
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139 Join date : 2013-08-07
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:36 am | |
| - Jake92 wrote:
- A deal would just prove a lack of ethics for the one getting the money.. It probably includes lawyers and judges too..
Am kind of surprised.....that would have been a HUGE ratings freakshow!.... | |
|
| |
Jake92
Posts : 1513 Join date : 2013-02-15 Age : 73 Location : Pensaclola, FL
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:44 am | |
| Just one side offered more money than the other... | |
|
| |
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139 Join date : 2013-08-07
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:48 am | |
| - Jake92 wrote:
- Just one side offered more money than the other...
Today's Justice....pretty sad Wonder what would or has happened to some other regular/ordinary citizens that killed someone while they were texting... | |
|
| |
Eric
Posts : 9738 Join date : 2012-07-30 Age : 73 Location : Pensacola
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:24 am | |
| MW, you hit the right chord on that last post. Celebrity status seems to have been the deciding factor. TMZ was emphatic that he was talking and NOT TEXTING on his cell phone. I think they may have reported that he was texting.https://www.tmz.com/2015/02/08/bruce-jenner-smoking-photo-texting-fatal-crash-search-warrant/ He was also smoking... and talking on the phone. (Talk about distracted driving.) Photo of cigarette being discarded. Two other factors. He was pulling a trailer with a hot rod on it (slows braking due to extra momentum), and he was being harassed by a paparazzi... plenty of photos of the accident, which the paparazzi may have caused by distracting Jenner. | |
|
| |
Jake92
Posts : 1513 Join date : 2013-02-15 Age : 73 Location : Pensaclola, FL
| Subject: Re: Question... Fri Oct 02, 2015 3:55 pm | |
| I agree 100% Eric......
If you hit somebody in the back, no matter why, it's YOUR fault.. The ONLY reason I can see for it not to be your fault is if the car in front is going backwards..
The paparazzi could possibly be charged if it can be PROVEN that he/she distracted Mr/Mz Jenner.. | |
|
| |
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139 Join date : 2013-08-07
| Subject: Re: Question... Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:39 am | |
| - Jake92 wrote:
- I agree 100% Eric......
If you hit somebody in the back, no matter why, it's YOUR fault.. The ONLY reason I can see for it not to be your fault is if the car in front is going backwards..
The paparazzi could possibly be charged if it can be PROVEN that he/she distracted Mr/Mz Jenner.. The paparazzi angel was the theory prior to the texting was discovered...no matter what certainly 'Mr/Mz Jenner' will not be responsible and/or accountable...there will or has been some kind of an excuse... | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Question... | |
| |
|
| |
| Question... | |
|