Everyday Pensacola

A place to discuss Pensacola, Florida area topics as well as the rest of the nation/world. To write a post, you must register and log in.
 
HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Was the DOE Government Loan Program a waste of money?

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Eric

avatar

Posts : 9735
Join date : 2012-07-30
Age : 67
Location : Hoover, AL & Pensacola when I'm lucky

PostSubject: Was the DOE Government Loan Program a waste of money?   Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:18 pm

Speaking of Green Energy funding, Energy Fact Check, a part of ACORE (American Council on Renewable Energy), states that 97% of green energy DOE funding is a success, with 3% failures (Solyndra, Fisker, etc.).  The ACORE report (year - 2012)

Quote :
CLAIM:
Fisker Automotive, Solyndra and other struggling green energy companies backed by Department of Energy loans are evidence that the government wastes money trying to pick “winners.”

FACT:
The DOE loan guarantee program is an overwhelmingly successful program that played a critical role in the development of new renewable energy technologies by offering long-term capital when private financing was not available.



  • The Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program has an approximately 97% success rate. As of late July, 2012, Solyndra, Abound Solar and the handful of other DOE-backed renewable energy companies that went bankrupt represented total investments of less than 3% of the entire DOE portfolio.  (Source: U.S. Department of Energy, April 2013, http://1.usa.gov/Nv1OeU)

  • It was well-known that the DOE’s loan programs would include a measured amount of risk.  Before offering loan guarantees, Congress moved to protect taxpayers by appropriating nearly $10 billion to cover potential losses, acknowledging the risks of funding new technologies in industries that were facing significant market and economic challenges. (Source: Department of Energy, April 2013, http://1.usa.gov/10dWZIE)

  • Following reports of Fisker Automotive’s financial difficulties, the Department of Energy acted decisively to protect the taxpayers’ interest. In June 2011, the Department ceased making disbursements to Fisker after the company began to fall short of the milestones required in the loan agreement. (Source: Department of Energy, April 2013, http://1.usa.gov/10dWZIE)

  • There is no evidence to suggest that Fisker Automotive’s loan was a political handout. Fisker was approached by the Bush administration about a potential loan in 2008. In early 2009, Fisker underwent a nine month-long review by DOE and several independent consulting firms to assess all aspects of Fisker’s business plan, technology, and finances. In 2009 – nearly 4 years ago – their business was deemed sound. (Source: House Oversight Committee, April 2013, http://1.usa.gov/10dWgY6)

  • The Loan Guarantee Program (LGP) and Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) loan program have many success stories. For example, as the American automobile industry fought to recover from the brink of collapse in 2008, DOE provided a $5.9 billion loan to Ford Motor Company to upgrade and modernize thirteen factories across six states. (Source: Department of Energy, April 2013, http://1.usa.gov/10dWZIE)

  • Another success story: In early March, 2013, Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk announced that Tesla will pay off their $465 million federal loan in five years, rather than the 10 years specified in the loan. The company made its first payment of nearly $13 million in December 2012 and hopes to pay off the loan by 2017 – 5 years ahead of the 2022 deadline. (Source: Associated Press, February 2013, http://bit.ly/WpP4b1)

  • Loan guarantees have a long history in the United States, and have been used to support many of America’s critical industries, including housing, transportation and agriculture. (Source: DBL Investors, September 2011, http://bit.ly/uV14lf)

  • The Loan Guarantee Program is not part of the Obama stimulus. The LGP was created in 2005 with bipartisan support under the George W. Bush administration and designed to provide government support for “innovative technologies.” (Source: CNNMoney, June 2012, http://cnnmon.ie/LBryTy)

  • The Loan Guarantee program has received bipartisan support in Congress.  In 2010, House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-Calif.) wrote Energy Secretary Steven Chu to support an Energy Department loan for Aptera Motors Inc., a Carlsbad, California, electric-car maker, according to a letter received by the department Jan. 14, 2010. Aptera went out of business in 2011 due to lack of financing. (Source: Bloomberg, September 2011, http://bloom.bg/rehAzh)

  • According to Richard Stuebi, managing director at clean tech venture capital firm Early Stage Partners, a 30% success rate is required for a “successful VC investment strategy” in the renewable energy sector. The DOE Loan Guarantee Program greatly exceeds this. (Source: Clean Technica, October 2011, http://bit.ly/oFRkJN)

    The attacks on clean energy companies are generally blown out of proportion. A Bloomberg Government analysis concluded that the “focus on Solyndra is not proportional to its impact.” (Source: Bloomberg Government, December 2011, http://bit.ly/rCXgZP)


Maybe this is spin, I dunno.  But it sounds good.

So, Who is ACORE?
Quote :
ACORE - a 501(c)(3) non-profit membership organization, is dedicated to building a secure and prosperous America with clean, renewable energy. ACORE provides a common educational platform for a wide range of interests in the renewable energy community, focusing on technology, finance, policy and market development. We convene thought leadership forums and create energy industry partnerships to communicate the economic, security and environmental benefits of renewable energy.

The scope of ACORE's membership spans all constituencies in the renewable energy sector, including financial institutions, government leaders, educators, end-users, professional service providers and allied non-profit groups.  http://www.acore.org/about

_________________
Ideas are funny little things, they won't work unless you do.
Back to top Go down
http://ericericson.net
riceme

avatar

Posts : 3098
Join date : 2012-12-02
Age : 45
Location : Fox, Alaska

PostSubject: Re: Was the DOE Government Loan Program a waste of money?   Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:25 pm

When they say that 97% of green energy funding is a success, are they measuring each dollar loaned or to each company loaned... follow me? That drastically changes the rate of success or failure.

It was good of congress to appropriate $10B to cover potential losses... Uhh, those were $10B *taxpayer* dollars, right?? Gee, thanks, guys.

I'd venture a guess that most folks are just as pissed at the automobile industry bail-out as the green energy loans, so I don't know why they're trying to make THAT sound like a selling point.

If John Q. Public realized how many freaking GAJILLIONS of dollars in subsidies coal and oil & gas gets on a permanent basis since the 60s - 70s, there would be rioting in the streets of D.C., so why ACORE doesn't throw that little factoid in there to stir the pot is beyond me.

The bottom line is that there is evidence that the gov't didn't perform due dilligence before "loaning" Solyndra &c a metric crap-ton of taxpayer dollars. And taxpayers are pissed about it.
Back to top Go down
 
Was the DOE Government Loan Program a waste of money?
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Everyday Pensacola :: Politics-
Jump to: