So, ECUA sold the ol' Stinky property anyway.

I think we all know that they are not going to build the conceptual project that was prepared by an entity unrelated to the buyer before the property hit the markets.

So, has the buyer just bought this land to sit on it and resell for a profit?

Or, will he build something wonderful that stimulates orgasmic delight at the sight of it?

Now that ECUA has $7.6 million from the property sale, I guess it is time to raise the rates...

NorthEscambia.com article

Eric, I love it and told my GF in Joisey that the reason I'm registered is to vote on local issues.

Be they be dammed.

Or, will he build something wonderful that stimulates orgasmic delight at the sight of it?

This!!!! I hope he builds it soon.......

Well, the buyer didn't execute his option to buy, so the land is back on the block.

Yep Back to the "Fish House" to work out another deal........WIS? Where is Studer? LOL

Studer hasn't found anything controversial enough to do with the property yet... 

I think your original assessment that the property needs a lot of work before it can be properly utilized is correct.

hallmarkgrad wrote:

I think your original assessment that the property needs a lot of work before it can be properly utilized is correct.

If they build rugged structures at the ground level... such as parking decks or vendor stalls... they won't have to build up the land much.

Considering the damage that occurred to the Chappie James building and City Hall, I don't think you could feasibly develop costly, permanent first floor structures at that location... and escape significant hurricane damage.