Poor Mrs Trump

I don't think she wrote that speech but some member of the Republican party working for the Donald did. She did a good job onstage presenting it.

It wouldn't matter at all that a few words were similar to the words Michelle Obama spoke when introducing her husband, except that the Republican party has brought up plagiarism every time anyone has mentioned Joe Biden's name. They've called him a cheat and a plagiarizer ever since he came on the political scene and they've never, ever given him a break.

Comes back to bite ya every time, don't it?

I don't know about Malania "plagiarizing" anything, maybe she did or a speechwriter did, but Biden has a well documented history of it - going all the way back to his law school years. Besides he is the politician - Malania is not.

Think back to 1988 and Neil Kinnock......LOLDNC!!!!!!!!

Drooling liberals have made more of a big deal about her little speech than the YEARS of documented HRC lies. What an amazing double standard.....

nochain wrote:

I don't know about Malania "plagiarizing" anything, maybe she did or a speechwriter did, but Biden has a well documented history of it - going all the way back to his law school years. Besides he is the politician - Malania is not.

Think back to 1988 and Neil Kinnock......LOLDNC!!!!!!!!

Drooling liberals have made more of a big deal about her little speech than the YEARS of documented HRC lies. What an amazing double standard.....

   Same people that bring this up.....defend/excuse hrc on national security violations....Yup using the same language/theme in part of a speech is FAR worse than the e-mail fiasco....lied....benghazi....lied....under fire in bosnia...lied...etc.,... Some of the same that actually believe that she's accomplished something....well except for keeping her butt out of jail....Further wasn't it a clinton/democrat rule that familes are to be left out of the political attacks?...

But consider the source of the attacker(s).....

Conservatives have hammered EVERY liberal woman in the White House -- and in point of fact were just last week mocking Chelsea Clinton, a married, highly educated, well paid professional, for having a baby as if she was Bristol Palin knocking out another fatherless bastard on the way to visit her brother in jail.

Conservatives carp endlessly about the supposed unamerican unclassy unchristian moral failings of liberals -- even when that liberal is a married highly-educated well-paid professional whose integrity and morality is basically beyond reproach and they'll do it just because that person happens to be a Clinton.

Meanwhile, Melania Trump? Foreign born. Posed for porn. Plagiarizes a speech FROM MICHELLE OBAMA OF ALL PEOPLE ... and suddenly they're all tolerant and accepting of porn, foreign accents, and theft.

I haven't seen any overt criticism of Chelsea for having a baby. Yet some on here literally scream that it is so. LOLDNC as they say.

If there was someone critical it certainly doesn't apply to a very large group of people who, like me, could give a rats patootie about Chelsea.

Drooling, limp-wristed, hypocritical liberals are the first to hammer family members of conservatives. as shown in the liberal post above even as that same liberal complains about a virtually nonexistent criticism of a liberal family member. That is the definition of a hypocrite.

Chelsea is not an innocent bystander, she spent quite some time railing against Bernie Sanders.

Unreal.....

nochain wrote:

I haven't seen any overt criticism of Chelsea for having a baby. Yet some on here literally scream that it is so. LOLDNC as they say.

If there was someone critical it certainly doesn't apply to a very large group of people who, like me, could give a rats patootie about Chelsea.

Drooling, limp-wristed, hypocritical liberals are the first to hammer family members of conservatives. as shown in the liberal post above even as that same liberal complains about a virtually nonexistent criticism of a liberal family member. That is the definition of a hypocrite.

Chelsea is not an innocent bystander, she spent quite some time railing against Bernie Sanders.

Unreal.....

When family members enter the 'political frey' then they are fair game....Malanie Trump was introducing herself to the public and attempting to show her husband in a different light.....

Chelsea Clinton went 'attackdog' [no comparing or belittling of dogs]....claiming that sanders would dismantle the healthcare system and made the famous quote 'now that Scalia is gone we can get the guns'....sanders returned fire and defended himself against the allegations made by c clinton [and was criticized] and her comments about gun control certainly is up for criticism...debate....Again some...will not or cannot comprehend the difference but it seems obvious....

The wife of the cowh has also entered into the mess of things with her comments like....everyday I wake up in a house built by slaves....I feel trapped in the WH like a prisoner etc.,...She has given speeches voicing her opinions about racism and other topics--which is her right and it's certainly the right of those that disagree to do so...Now, when or if Malanie Trump enters into political issues then she will also be open to criticism....

It's terribly terribly sad how vain and shallow these people are. The Trumps, all their wealth, all their fame, all their looks and jewels and private jets and limos and all their billionaire friends, and they are so utterly insecure in themselves that they simply can NOT admit error in any way even when caught in a lie, a provable and obvious and DUMB lie, in front of the entire world.

If these people were the people they claim to be, that they want to be, they'd take responsibility. They'd own that speech and give the critics nowhere to go.

But they are NOT those people.

These people, they copied from the Obamas because they have nothing of their own.

All their wealth and power can't buy class, so they tried to steal it and pass it off as their own.

And that, well, that's just plain sad

polecat wrote:

It's terribly terribly sad how vain and shallow these people are. The Trumps, all their wealth, all their fame, all their looks and jewels and private jets and limos and all their billionaire friends, and they are so utterly insecure in themselves that they simply can NOT admit error in any way even when caught in a lie, a provable and obvious and DUMB lie, in front of the entire world.

If these people were the people they claim to be, that they want to be, they'd take responsibility. They'd own that speech and give the critics nowhere to go.

But they are NOT those people.

These people, they copied from the Obamas because they have nothing of their own.

All their wealth and power can't buy class, so they tried to steal it and pass it off as their own.

And that, well, that's just plain sad

Like the Kennedys always took responsibilities?......

mediawatcher wrote:

polecat wrote:

It's terribly terribly sad how vain and shallow these people are. The Trumps, all their wealth, all their fame, all their looks and jewels and private jets and limos and all their billionaire friends, and they are so utterly insecure in themselves that they simply can NOT admit error in any way even when caught in a lie, a provable and obvious and DUMB lie, in front of the entire world.

If these people were the people they claim to be, that they want to be, they'd take responsibility. They'd own that speech and give the critics nowhere to go.

But they are NOT those people.

These people, they copied from the Obamas because they have nothing of their own.

All their wealth and power can't buy class, so they tried to steal it and pass it off as their own.

And that, well, that's just plain sad

   Like the Kennedys always took responsibilities?......

What about HRC? While she was landing under sniper fire in Bosnia she was plotting how to hide her activities from the public eye by using a bogus home server for government emails.

Yea, talk about "class"......

nochain wrote:

mediawatcher wrote:

polecat wrote:

It's terribly terribly sad how vain and shallow these people are. The Trumps, all their wealth, all their fame, all their looks and jewels and private jets and limos and all their billionaire friends, and they are so utterly insecure in themselves that they simply can NOT admit error in any way even when caught in a lie, a provable and obvious and DUMB lie, in front of the entire world.

If these people were the people they claim to be, that they want to be, they'd take responsibility. They'd own that speech and give the critics nowhere to go.

But they are NOT those people.

These people, they copied from the Obamas because they have nothing of their own.

All their wealth and power can't buy class, so they tried to steal it and pass it off as their own.

And that, well, that's just plain sad

   Like the Kennedys always took responsibilities?......

What about HRC? While she was landing under sniper fire in Bosnia she was plotting how to hide her activities from the public eye by using a bogus home server for government emails.

Yea, talk about "class"......

Amazing that there are still some that insist that it's only one side of the political equation that is or has been classless....corrupt...'vain'....'shallow'....Here's the irony about one comment that was made about Trump's and "all their wealth, all their fame, all their looks and jewels and private jets and limos and all their billionaire friends, and they are so utterly insecure in themselves"...etc., [continued rant].....Trump inherited money and GREW his money in the private sector through his business [not defending] and investments---As far as it has been concluded he's conducted his businesses in a lawful way discounting the jealous rantings of some lunatics.....He financed his primary run ....again in a lawful manner...and for those that feel this is the problem then you're the problem!....The corruption and sickness has occurred by career elected politicians that have spent little or no time in the private sector working/creating jobs but have become multi-millionaires in politics and will do whatever needs to be done to hold on to their power control---There's the problem!...Before any whining starts there's examples of both sides practicing this neither side has exclusive rights on the practice....Between the politicans and their families lining their pockets on taxpayers money and/or insider information there's a problem that should be solved---to prove the point that it's both sides....may be the reason neither party has or wants to address it....But to those that have the jealous rantings of those with success in the private sector to ignore the real problem says more about them and why the problem has been allowed to grow and continue...Lastly,...hate to break it to some....but there are and have been wealthy democrat families that aren't exactly the shining lights they've been held up to be...remember the people in glass houses saying?.....

That would be a picture of a classy lady climbing down off an airplane and wearing clothes that are meant for a vacation. Do you have a problem with women wearing shorts? You must have had some reason to post it. I'm just wondering why since the picture was put on a thread about Melania Trump's speech.

I'm betting you'd prefer the magazine picture of Melania nearly naked. That one is really of a classy potential first lady. Right?

Wait a minute. What did I say, nearly naked?

I just can't get over what a "classy first lady" she will be. Once, twice, three times a lady. Even four.

You really need to get over the criticism of Michelle Obama's looks.

At least she is not a naked tramp lying on a faux fur blanket. That butt nekked woman can't be made into a first "lady" by voting for Trump anymore than Bill Clinton can be turned into a first "gentleman" by voting for Hillary. It's all hypocrisy.

"You do know that there will be at least a couple here that will find your photo offensive to the cowh's wife!. There will then be criticism about Malania's photos---Again jealousy---but they've got anthony weiner! Remember huma's old man?....You always just try and stir things up"    


That is directly posted above and the statement is in a white frame indicating nochain posted it, not mediawatcher. Yet there is no post above by nochain  that says the same thing. Mediawatcher must have edited nochain's post to make it seem like someone was able to predict my objection to the picture.     That is especially obvious since the statement has been inserted by mediawatcher between two paragraphs that occurred in nochain's previous post.                                                                                     

You obviously have talent in reframing your posts on here. Or it's very possible you and nochain are the same poster.

Otherwise, mediawatcher is capable of editing nochain's post and there's some glitch in the system. I doubt that though.

It seems Melania isn't the only one who knows how to plagiarize.

I'm sure she is well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the trump.

Yeah, just like those folks that built the White House.

Someone should have told him to buy her some clothes too, I'm sure she has worked hard enough to deserve at least some underwear.

Eddard wrote:

"You do know that there will be at least a couple here that will find your photo offensive to the cowh's wife!. There will then be criticism about Malania's photos---Again jealousy---but they've got anthony weiner! Remember huma's old man?....You always just try and stir things up"    


That is directly posted above and the statement is in a white frame indicating nochain posted it, not mediawatcher. Yet there is no post above by nochain  that says the same thing. Mediawatcher must have edited nochain's post to make it seem like someone was able to predict my objection to the picture.     That is especially obvious since the statement has been  inserted by mediawatcher  between two paragraphs that occurred in  nochain's  previous post.                                                                                     

You obviously have talent in reframing your posts on here. Or it's very possible you and nochain are the same poster.

Otherwise, mediawatcher is capable of editing nochain's post and there's some glitch in the system. I doubt that though.

It seems Melania isn't the only one who knows how to plagiarize.

Nice try as you've done before here and on the other forum....there's no conspiracy....no Blackhawk's circling, and I am not posting under anything other than 'mediawatcher' as it always has been...Possess no capabilities of editing anyones posts but if it keeps things interesting continue to believe....

Eddard wrote:

"You do know that there will be at least a couple here that will find your photo offensive to the cowh's wife!. There will then be criticism about Malania's photos---Again jealousy---but they've got anthony weiner! Remember huma's old man?....You always just try and stir things up"    


That is directly posted above and the statement is in a white frame indicating nochain posted it, not mediawatcher. Yet there is no post above by nochain  that says the same thing. Mediawatcher must have edited nochain's post to make it seem like someone was able to predict my objection to the picture.     That is especially obvious since the statement has been  inserted by mediawatcher  between two paragraphs that occurred in  nochain's  previous post.                                                                                     

You obviously have talent in reframing your posts on here. Or it's very possible you and nochain are the same poster.

Otherwise, mediawatcher is capable of editing nochain's post and there's some glitch in the system. I doubt that though.

It seems Melania isn't the only one who knows how to plagiarize.

LOL!!!!!!! Unbelievable!!!!!! No wait, it IS believable!!!!

nochain wrote:

Eddard wrote:

"You do know that there will be at least a couple here that will find your photo offensive to the cowh's wife!. There will then be criticism about Malania's photos---Again jealousy---but they've got anthony weiner! Remember huma's old man?....You always just try and stir things up"    


That is directly posted above and the statement is in a white frame indicating nochain posted it, not mediawatcher. Yet there is no post above by nochain  that says the same thing. Mediawatcher must have edited nochain's post to make it seem like someone was able to predict my objection to the picture.     That is especially obvious since the statement has been  inserted by mediawatcher  between two paragraphs that occurred in  nochain's  previous post.                                                                                     

You obviously have talent in reframing your posts on here. Or it's very possible you and nochain are the same poster.

Otherwise, mediawatcher is capable of editing nochain's post and there's some glitch in the system. I doubt that though.

It seems Melania isn't the only one who knows how to plagiarize.

LOL!!!!!!! Unbelievable!!!!!! No wait, it IS believable!!!!

      At the risk of answering you....errr myself.....no you..... ......Must be a hole in the tinfoil somewhere......

The evidence provided itself in your posts.

Generally speaking, I believe what my eyes show me. I'll stick to my observations this time too, especially since there are only the two of you denying it.

"Other forum?" I don't think so. I don't have time for another forum and you might notice I'm usually not around posting on this one. We just got back from a trip to Yosemite, Los Angeles, Carlsbad, and the Grand Canyon that lasted over a month. If you've never seen Half Dome rock in Yosemite, you've missed out on the most beautiful sight in the world. America really is Beautiful.

Way more beautiful than the thinking of some of its citizens.

Eddard wrote:

The evidence provided itself in your posts.

Generally speaking, I believe what my eyes show me. I'll stick to my observations this time too, especially since there are only the two of you denying it.

"Other forum?"  I don't think so. I don't have time for another forum and you might notice I'm usually not around posting on this one. We just got back from a trip to Yosemite, Los Angeles, Carlsbad, and the Grand Canyon that lasted over a month. If you've never seen Half Dome rock in Yosemite, you've missed out on the most beautiful sight in the world. America really is Beautiful.

Way more beautiful than the thinking of some of its citizens.

Well at least you're entertaining in a sad way. You seem to have a unique talent claiming as fact something so wrong. Must simplify your life........

Life is simple when you accept science as reality and believe what you see and not whatever the spin is that comes out of your computer or TV set.


This thread has turned into a discussion of class. It's not very classy to insult the father of a dead serviceman just because he's a Muslim. I think the Donald has finally found out what would actually happen if he went into the middle of 5th avenue and killed someone.
I honestly think his comments yesterday may have ended any hopes he ever had to be president.

nochain wrote:

Eddard wrote:

The evidence provided itself in your posts.

Generally speaking, I believe what my eyes show me. I'll stick to my observations this time too, especially since there are only the two of you denying it.

"Other forum?"  I don't think so. I don't have time for another forum and you might notice I'm usually not around posting on this one. We just got back from a trip to Yosemite, Los Angeles, Carlsbad, and the Grand Canyon that lasted over a month. If you've never seen Half Dome rock in Yosemite, you've missed out on the most beautiful sight in the world. America really is Beautiful.

Way more beautiful than the thinking of some of its citizens.

Well at least you're entertaining in a sad way. You seem to have a unique talent claiming as fact something so wrong. Must simplify your life........

Isn't that a plank in the DNC's platform?.....'Claiming as fact something so wrong'......When you have a convention where a moment of silence is interrupted by blm thugs...a former intelligence leader is BOO'd for wanting to kill more terrorists before they kill us...and you allow the mother of a criminal thug to speak...that's where the democrat party is at today....They had a rigged system...denied...and then got caught....and have nominated/coronated the most corrupt candidate that has no success in any area she's either been elected to or appointed....

Nobody rigged the primary system. There was talk in e-mails about ways to villify Sanders, like making his religion an issue. Those things didn't happen. Hillary Clinton never made them an issue and neither did the Democratic party.
Hillary Clinton got 3 million more  votes in the Democratic primaries than Bernie Sanders.

That's actual votes, not delegates or super delegates. No one paid me or forced me to vote for Hillary Clinton.

Trayveon Martin was not a thug. He had no criminal record at all. He was armed with a package of gummy bears and George Zimmerman was armed with a pistol. That's the thug who murdered him. Zimmerman did have charges against him both before and after he killed Trayveon. He's proven what a jerk he is ever since he got freed from jail.
You're the one who doesn't believe what his eyes and ears tell him, not me.