mediawatcher
Posts : 3139
Join date : 2013-08-07
 | | Subject: More deception.... Thu Feb 11, 2016 8:57 am | |
| US Army orders hundreds of soldiers back to Afghanistan....How's that no boots on the ground rhetoric working out?.... | |
|
Eric
Posts : 9738
Join date : 2012-07-30
Age : 73
Location : Pensacola
| | Subject: Re: More deception.... Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:41 pm | |
| I thought the no boots on the ground statement was about Iraq... which has been violated already. | |
|
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139
Join date : 2013-08-07
| | Subject: Re: More deception.... Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:09 am | |
| - Eric wrote:
- I thought the no boots on the ground statement was about Iraq... which has been violated already.
The cowh also indicated that combat missions had stopped in Afghanistan and that there would be a draw down and no troop increases...which has happened twice....This is why when the last soldier in Afghanistan was killed there became the definition of killed in combat by the administration...He was granted all benefits of killed in combat but the administration did not want that wording publically for political reasons----like there's anyone that would be that gullible to believe that he wasn't killed in combat circumstances....well except for those that still follow the cowh without question..... | |
|
riceme
Posts : 3098
Join date : 2012-12-02
Age : 52
Location : Fox, Alaska
| | Subject: Re: More deception.... Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:35 am | |
| - mediawatcher wrote:
- Eric wrote:
- I thought the no boots on the ground statement was about Iraq... which has been violated already.
The cowh also indicated that combat missions had stopped in Afghanistan and that there would be a draw down and no troop increases...which has happened twice....This is why when the last soldier in Afghanistan was killed there became the definition of killed in combat by the administration...He was granted all benefits of killed in combat but the administration did not want that wording publically for political reasons----like there's anyone that would be that gullible to believe that he wasn't killed in combat circumstances....well except for those that still follow the cowh without question..... This should be in the dictionary under the word "shady." | |
|
Eric
Posts : 9738
Join date : 2012-07-30
Age : 73
Location : Pensacola
| | Subject: Re: More deception.... Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:18 am | |
| MW, I read "killed in combat" and assume that it was the previous designation?
What do they call it now? Doublespeak, f'sure
| |
|
mediawatcher
Posts : 3139
Join date : 2013-08-07
| | Subject: Re: More deception.... Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:01 am | |
| - Eric wrote:
- MW, I read "killed in combat" and assume that it was the previous designation?
What do they call it now? Doublespeak, f'sure
Kind of like 'workplace' violence...For the killed in combat to even be debated is disrespectful.... | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: More deception.... | |
| |
|
