Clinton Hypocrisy.....

Hillary Clinton, just three weeks after blasting 'unaccountable money' and calling for campaign finance overhaul, met with donors of a Super PAC backing her White House Campaign on Wednesday--the first such face-to-face meetings held by a Democratic presidential candidate.

FYI: Hillary is seeking $2 Billion to END big money politics......

If obama, hillary, and I were stranded on a deserted island... I would be the leader.

I'm amazed we elect such weak leaders.

You'd probably be alone after a month or two unless you're planning to do everything for them... That's as long as you can avoid being eaten when they revert to cannibalism because they can't fend for themselves.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ELnhjGw4Zs

nochain wrote:

Hey wait that's not fair....Bill said they've done nothing wrong....and when the questioned had a follow up it became..."I don't know I just work here".....For all the squawking they've done about....corporations...banks....wall street...and unaccountable money it's amazing that she or he don't get hounded like some others have had to go through...For being in the public eye their entire lives it's amazing that there are still this many unanswered questions....well except for the fact of lazy..biased..and an agenda driven media....

How could anyone appalled over the corrupt banks and wall st vote for her?

PkrBum wrote:

How could anyone appalled over the corrupt banks and wall st vote for her?

All this is happening prior to the primaries and general election...why would anyone believe that this behavior would stop should the sheep elect her?...Look at what they've done the last two elections....there's your clue!...

PkrBum wrote:

How could anyone appalled over the corrupt banks and wall st vote for her?

They will hold their nose and do it because - as low information voters - regardless of how bad HRC is, they still think she is better than anyone else.

STEWART: I guess the rule here is money is free speech, unless that money speaks with a funny accent.

Of course the talking heads over at Fox have no problem whatsoever with that money flowing into political campaigns and have spent countless hours complaining about how any attempts to fix our campaign finance system amount to stifling "free speech." They complain that the foreign money donated for charity has to be corruption, but that money from Americans flowing into our elections is just fine


God told Mike Huckabee, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson and Jeb Bush to run for President b/c God loves us and wants us to laugh.- John Fugelsang

Foreign governments and foreign investors have no business in United States politics.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02cZoM5reqo

Numerous individuals and entities that don't fit the model for Democratic Party donors have donated to the Clinton Foundation. For instance:
◾Newsmax Media, Inc. The media company, which has billed itself as operating the "#1 Conservative Site in the Nation," has made donations to the Clinton Foundation of between $100,001 to $250,000 and between $1,000,001 to $5,000,000.
◾Donald J. Trump. Trump, a perennial-potential Republican presidential candidate, donated between $100,001 to $250,000 to the foundation.
◾Richard M. Scaife. The late Scaife, who published the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, was described as "one of America's leading funders of conservative causes." He donated between $250,001 to $500,000 to the foundation.
◾News Corporation Foundation. The foundation for News Corp., which is headed by Rupert Murdoch and was formerly the parent company of Fox News, donated between $500,001 to $1,000,000 to the foundation.
◾James R. Murdoch. Murdoch, the co-chief operating officer of Fox News parent company 21st Century Fox and son of Rupert Murdoch, donated between $1,000,001 to $5,000,000.

High-Profile Republicans Have Supported The Clinton Foundation's Efforts

Many Republican Party-affiliated individuals have attended and supported Clinton Foundation-affiliated events, including the annual Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) meetings. They include former first lady Laura Bush, Fox News founder Rupert Murdoch, former GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina, Republican billionaire T. Boone Pickens, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former Bush Treasury secretary Hank Paulson, and former first daughter Barbara Bush

There's no practical reason why foreign govts that oppress their citizenry need to donate to the clinton slush fund to help under privileged countries... it isn't practical or logical except to someone that will accept any excuse to support their hopeful dear leader. It also came out that they made 30 million last year... placing them in the top 1% of the top 1%. Congratulations comrades..!!

PkrBum wrote:

There's no practical reason why foreign govts that oppress their citizenry need to donate to the clinton slush fund to help under privileged countries... it isn't practical or logical except to someone that will accept any excuse to support their hopeful dear leader. It also came out that they made 30 million last year... placing them in the top 1% of the top 1%. Congratulations comrades..!!

     Nah.....They're "flat broke"..... The real issue is that they ALL do this and yet there are some that seem to only focus on one political party as violators and the other side seldom gets called on it all and when they are caught suddenly it's portrayed as a mistake....Like George Stephanopoulos and his unclaimed donations to the Clinton Foundation maybe if he'd worked at Fox there would be more of an outrage...And Rand Paul is labeled a 'radical' because he has raised the very issue about foreign aid and foreign money coming in from countries that oppress their own people and do not like the United States...If that makes Paul a radical...then what the hell is Hillary?.....

The latest populist savior apparently.

PkrBum wrote:

The latest populist savior apparently.

She's a 1%er of the 1%ers that's against the 1%ers in this country....She and Bill are entitled to their wealth but know what's best for everyone else...And people support her.....

Saw an interview with a female Hillary voter and when the reporter asked her if she was aware that Hillary pays her female employees less than her male employees but yet claims to be a crusader for equal pay and women's rights...the voter answered 'really is that true?'...'Oh, maybe I shouldn't be voting for her'....

At least she is consistent, she has been a hyper-hypocrite her entire life. She has two mottos: "Do unto others before they do unto you" and "Don't do as I do, do as I say"

"Hillary breaking the hypocrisy meter"

"When The Post asked about the role of Priorities USA Action, a pro-Clinton super PAC currently trying to raise hundreds of millions of dollars to help her campaign, Clinton shrugged her shoulders and said, “I don’t know.”

In other words, it’s time to get other peoples’ money out of politics. And she isn’t yet prepared to tell us what her “plan for a plan” is. And remember this is the woman who socked away millions from giving speeches to Wall Street firms, allowing her to be more than comfortable and unemployed while running for office."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/04/15/hillary-breaking-the-hypocrisy-meter/

It would be almost funny if people actually looked behind the curtain. We had obama last week lamenting the privileged of the lucky attending private schools... while he and his children both attended. Then both he and hillary railing against the elite 1%... while both are firmly entrenched 1%ers. Why don't they give back every cent that isn't necessary to subsist? Rid themselves of every perk and all "luck"... including private planes, vacation homes, and private schools for their children or grandchildren. Cmon... walk the walk comrades.

Nothing HRC $ay$ can era$e the fact all she care$ about i$ MONEY. She is so hooked to big business and the hyper-wealthy in this country and many foreign concerns that there is no possibility of objectivity on her part if she acquires public office. She needs to man up and quit lying.

"Hillary Clinton was paid millions by tech industry for speeches"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hillary-clinton-was-paid-millions-by-tech-industry-for-speeches/2015/05/18/f149d598-fd86-11e4-805c-c3f407e5a9e9_story.html?hpid=z1

nochain wrote:

Nothing HRC $ay$ can era$e the fact all she care$ about i$ MONEY. She is so hooked to big business and the hyper-wealthy in this country and many foreign concerns that there is no possibility of objectivity on her part if she acquires public office. She needs to man up and quit lying.

"Hillary Clinton was paid millions by tech industry for speeches"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hillary-clinton-was-paid-millions-by-tech-industry-for-speeches/2015/05/18/f149d598-fd86-11e4-805c-c3f407e5a9e9_story.html?hpid=z1

Gets more amazing daily....just how can she get away with being a 1%er...accepting huge donations from foreign and domestic sources...and still speak out of the other side of her mouth when she [and others] blame the 1%ers for being greedy and caring for their wealth plus adding all the comments about the 'unaccountable' money in politics that she says she's against all the while attempting to raise $2 [plus] Billion to get to the WH....In this case her strategy seems to be avoiding the media and their questions---if they'd even ask....

It'll never happen.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lq0fUa0vW_E

I think she should be arrested for deleting her server. Her word isn't good enough to take that she turned over all of the emails... just as our word isn't good enough when dealing with the govt or judicial system. Further... there is no practical reason to delete a server except to hide illegal activity.

http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/report-hillary-clinton-used-second-private-email-account/

Quote :

MAY 19, 2015, 7:36 AM|Clinton’s lawyers insist the second account was not an address that existed during her time as secretary of state. The State Department also revealed that it plans to release 55,000 pages of Clinton emails by January 2016. Nancy Cordes reports from Cedar Falls, Iowa.

Eric wrote:

http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/report-hillary-clinton-used-second-private-email-account/

Quote :

MAY 19, 2015, 7:36 AM|Clinton’s lawyers insist the second account was not an address that existed during her time as secretary of state. The State Department also revealed that it plans to release 55,000 pages of Clinton emails by January 2016. Nancy Cordes reports from Cedar Falls, Iowa.

The State Department is now a functionary of the Clinton campaign. I suppose they were told to wait until late in the 16 election cycle to release something.

This whole administration is absolutely corrupt.

Couple more scandals and the progressives will definitely make sure she gets put in the White House...

*****SARCASTIC CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSwaVvF7rdU