Billary gets busted

I agree 100% MW.. I hope charges are coming out soon so they can start legal proceedings, and they last until after the next president is sworn in so Obama can't pardon her on his last day in office.. Perhaps they can swing a deal for less time for her if she spills the beans on a lot of his illegal/unethical things...

Part of the problem is she purposefully set up layers between her directives and the actual acts. Another is that I highly doubt the obama administration would allow a full fledged investigation or prosecution... that hasn't been their pattern. I think the "senior administration official" that leaked the story to the nyt was probably jarrett. The idea being that it would be damaging enough alone to ruin her chances... which seems very unlikely to me considering that both her and obama's followers don't ever seem interested in accountability.

PkrBum wrote:

Part of the problem is she purposefully set up layers between her directives and the actual acts. Another is that I highly doubt the obama administration would allow a full fledged investigation or prosecution... that hasn't been their pattern. I think the "senior administration official" that leaked the story to the nyt was probably jarrett. The idea being that it would be damaging enough alone to ruin her chances... which seems very unlikely to me considering that both her and obama's followers don't ever seem interested in accountability.

You are correct this DOJ and the rest of the Administration has/is/will be amateur hour....When there is a reason for federal intervention like in immigration cases they tell the federal law enforcement agencies not to enforce the laws which have resulted in murders and other violent crimes....The new AG was immediately on the scene in Baltimore to oversee law enforcement and the Baltimore Prosecutor jumps in and charges six officers and now when the autopsy report returns there are more questions about this incident and even experts are saying that the high charges will never be made...so once again they intervened to be politically correct before allowing the investigations to gather the evidence---although the prosecutor was aware of the new circumstances and withheld until she was mandated by law to do so...

So yes...trusting and/or expecting this administration/doj to conduct a competent investigation and/or prosecution in the e-mail crimes would be foolish.....

So Republicans have said a Muslim can't be president or build a clock but "the biggest discrimination going on is against" Christians?- LOLGOP

polecat wrote:

So Republicans have said a Muslim can't be president or build a clock but "the biggest discrimination going on is against" Christians?- LOLGOP

  [Republicans]?....That would be ONE candidate and not every republican....Dr Carson attempted to make a clarification that should have included any Muslim that believes Sharia Law as the law which would be in conflict with the Constitution of the US.. Had he said that there would not be this problem...BUT...that being said Dr Carson made a HUGE error when he attempted to answer a 'gotcha' question...rookie error on the part of a non-politician...If there were a reference to Trump...don't believe he's responsible for what a supporter or a plant may say....So again....foolish to attempt to say that 'republicans' all believe a statement by one...

  In your other example....you know that the school officials were [republicans] when they reported the clock brought to school by the young man?....Foolish...but expected to attempt to make the claim that a reaction or over reaction is somehow based on party affiliation....If the principal turned out to be a democrat certainly wouldn't attempt to make the same foolish claim....

mediawatcher wrote:

polecat wrote:

So Republicans have said a Muslim can't be president or build a clock but "the biggest discrimination going on is against" Christians?- LOLGOP

  [Republicans]?....That would be ONE candidate and not every republican....Dr Carson attempted to make a clarification that should have included any Muslim that believes Sharia Law as the law which would be in conflict with the Constitution of the US.. Had he said that there would not be this problem...BUT...that being said Dr Carson made a HUGE error when he attempted to answer a 'gotcha' question...rookie error on the part of a non-politician...If there were a reference to Trump...don't believe he's responsible for what a supporter or a plant may say....So again....foolish to attempt to say that 'republicans' all believe a statement by one...

  In your other example....you know that the school officials were [republicans] when they reported the clock brought to school by the young man?....Foolish...but expected to attempt to make the claim that a reaction or over reaction is somehow based on party affiliation....If the principal turned out to be a democrat certainly wouldn't attempt to make the same foolish claim....

It's hilarious isn't it? ONE guy says something while everyone else in the campaign said that isn't even legal. But to the liberal mind when one person says something that means they are speaking for millions - even when they aren't in office. I suppose it's because they are so used to having others tell them how to think........

Was Billary speaking for the entire liberal base too when she said all Americans are too stupid to make their own decisions?

"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices ... Government has to make those choices for people"

nochain wrote:

mediawatcher wrote:

polecat wrote:

So Republicans have said a Muslim can't be president or build a clock but "the biggest discrimination going on is against" Christians?- LOLGOP

  [Republicans]?....That would be ONE candidate and not every republican....Dr Carson attempted to make a clarification that should have included any Muslim that believes Sharia Law as the law which would be in conflict with the Constitution of the US.. Had he said that there would not be this problem...BUT...that being said Dr Carson made a HUGE error when he attempted to answer a 'gotcha' question...rookie error on the part of a non-politician...If there were a reference to Trump...don't believe he's responsible for what a supporter or a plant may say....So again....foolish to attempt to say that 'republicans' all believe a statement by one...

  In your other example....you know that the school officials were [republicans] when they reported the clock brought to school by the young man?....Foolish...but expected to attempt to make the claim that a reaction or over reaction is somehow based on party affiliation....If the principal turned out to be a democrat certainly wouldn't attempt to make the same foolish claim....

It's hilarious isn't it? ONE guy says something while everyone else in the campaign said that isn't even legal. But to the liberal mind when one person says something that means they are speaking for millions - even when they aren't in office. I suppose it's because they are so used to having others tell them how to think........

Was Billary speaking for the entire liberal base too when she said all Americans are too stupid to make their own decisions?

"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices ... Government has to make those choices for people"

      Because a 'supporter?' at a Trump rally yelled that a muslim shouldn't be president....there were some [many] in the media that attempted to link Trump as supporting the statement/question...Defenders said that Trump is not morally and/or ethically bound to chastise someone that yells something stupid at a rally....It's just amazing that there will always be some that will attempt to claim that is all of a group when it's a statement/question from one....well if it happens to be a republican than even foolishness passes the credibility criteria for some....

As a folowup...the media in attendance attempt to contact/interview the 'supporter?'...and immediately after yelling his comment he vanished....