Darn E-Mails....

More documents and e-mails have surfaced and reveal unusual pressure from Key Democrat (Sen Levin D-MI) Senator to target Conservative Groups... Quick Review:

Like Benghazi there was a cover story about spontaneous protests and the internet video as the cause for the attack. Now with this IRS scandal the cover story was...a few rogue agents in Cincinnati...With the release of documents that story has been exposed as not being true and there were links to the Washington DC Office...guess Louis Lerner forgot to shred before she left...

In an interview the cowh stated that there was not one smidgeon of evidence of any wrongdoing in the IRS...Perhaps he was correct when he said "one"...

Really? Now we're back to the IRS scandal? Even though it was proven months ago that they were targeting liberal groups as well as conservative ones?
And Benghazi? That happened before Obama was elected last time around.

If these are the issues Republicans intend to run on in 2016, they will lose again.
Even if The Democrats nominate a "brain damaged" candidate like Karl Rove believes Hillary Clinton to be.

By the way, that comment didn't even go over well with some Republicans.
Old Bill will still be around to help Hillary out if she has any problems.
\
And Old Bill is still, 16 years later, the Republicans worst nightmare ever.


Here's one simple idea that the Republican party might try one year soon:  Try coming up with one positive idea of something to do that will help the country and push it forward. Plan it out and let us know what it is.  An IDEA of how to change something you don't like, instead of just grousing over old news.

Until they do, the Republican party will never become a majority party. By gerrymandering they may actually take the house or senate, but they will never win another Presidential election unless they can think of just one idea to push forward that is not just being against something the Dems want or something that is already the law of the land.

Otter wrote:

Really? Now we're back to the IRS scandal? Even though it was proven months ago that they were targeting liberal groups as well as conservative ones?
And Benghazi? That happened before Obama was elected last time around.

If these are the issues Republicans intend to run on in 2016, they will lose again.
Even if The Democrats nominate a "brain damaged" candidate like Karl Rove believes Hillary Clinton to be.

By the way, that comment didn't even go over well with some Republicans.
Old Bill will still be around to help Hillary out if she has any problems.
\
And Old Bill is still, 16 years later, the Republicans worst nightmare ever.


Here's one simple idea that the Republican party might try one year soon:  Try coming up with one positive idea of something to do that will help the country and push it forward. Plan it out and let us know what it is.  An IDEA of how to change something you don't like, instead of just grousing over old news.

Until they do, the Republican party will never become a majority party. By gerrymandering they may actually take the house or senate, but they will never win another Presidential election unless they can think of just one idea to push forward that is not just being against something the Dems want or something that is already the law of the land.

You're opening statement...AGREE!....Don't care if its conservative/liberal groups that were targeted...IT WAS WRONG and those responsible need to be held accountable... It was an abuse of their powers and if congress members were influential in their pressure they too were wrong...

Not a defender of Karl Rove by any means...but this certainly isnt the first and won't be the last time the health/age of a candidate will be an issue...now how it's handled will be what is judged..

Transparency and honesty? Not in this administration......

Voters need to get involved and get rid of the parasites.

nochain wrote:

Transparency and honesty? Not in this administration......

Voters need to get involved and get rid of the parasites.

 
     "The most open and transparent government in the history of the United States"---cowh.
 
     Always is funny when some here ask..."are we back to that".....Well maybe if the IRS/Benghazi issues wouldn't have been stonewalled...obstructed...lied about then perhaps they would have ran their course... The cowh and this administration have only themselves to blame for these and other scandals...
 
      The VA is a total fiasco and remember it was the cowh as a candidate that went after President Bush and the "deplorable" conditions at Walter Reed.  Yes, the situation was deplorable and needed to be taken care of...but what has this cowh and his administration done in the past six years under their watch to turn the mess around....well other than blame President Bush?...

nochain wrote:

His record has and will speak for itself....

mediawatcher wrote:

nochain wrote:

     His record has and will speak for itself....

I think that his record will depend on the success or failure of Obamacare and not much else. He hasn't been much different than W on world affairs. He hasn't done much else on domestic affairs other than Obamacare.

If it succeeds in the future he will always be remembered as the POTUS that initiated national healthcare.
If it fails, he'll be the goat.

I don't expect him to end up being the goat, though I think it will take several years to realize the program actually works. It's going to take some fine tuning but I believe now that it will work.

The BIGGEST problem people have with Obamacare is that the damn politicians that FORCED it on us are exempt... The voters did NOT vote for him because of the health care.

Jake92 wrote:

The BIGGEST problem people have with Obamacare is that the damn politicians that FORCED it on us are exempt...  The voters did NOT vote for him because of the health care.

Jake, Congressmen  have workplace insurance. No one with workplace insurance is required to buy Obamacare.

I know saying they are exempt sounds good but there are millions of Americans who already have their own insurance that are also exempt. I have insurance myself already so I didn't have to change to Obamacare, and nothing changed in my policy because of Obamacare.
I actually did vote for Obama originally because he said he wanted national health coverage. It's one of the few things he campaigned for that he actually "almost" gave us. He campaigned on single payer but I imagine that would have been even more of a problem to get past the Republicans than Obamacare was.

I'm also covered without Obamacare. What about the politicians families AND their workers, ie; secretaries, assistants, and other workers the congresmen and women employ..